Sunday, April 25, 2004

When the butterfly flaps its wings


Earth Day 2004
[my lay sharing on 4/25/04 in the Early Service]

In Brazil, a butterfly flaps its wings, setting off a chain of events that ends with a tornado in Texas. These types of sayings illustrate the concepts of so-called chaos theory, but to me, it says something more. But first, perhaps a little explanation.

First, Chaos theory is based on the following two concepts:
1) systems may appear to lack order but there are always underlying, if inexplicable, rules governing them; and
2) small or simple events can cause bigger or more complex events within the same system. Meteorologist Edward Lorenz first described the butterfly effect in 1972. The example of a small event such as the flapping of a butterfly's wings creating a tornado in Texas illustrates the impossibility of making completely accurate predictions about complex systems. Although the impact of events may be determined by underlying conditions in the system, precisely what those conditions are and what the impact will be can never be sufficiently articulated to allow long-range predictions.

Now clearly, this is a high-falutin’ way for a weather person to cop out on why their predictions are never right!

If you do a web search on the phrase "when a butterfly flaps its wings" you'll get all sorts of interesting things.

a butterfly flaps its wings in Beijing, the stock market on Wall Street flounders.

The flap of a butterfly's wings in Central Park could ultimately cause an earthquake in China.

There are some quite humorous stories, and I don't want to take up your time relating them all, but the point being illustrated over and over again is that small things can have larger, unforeseen consequences. The use of the term chaos can also be confusing, since most of us thing of it as something negative, but this new meaning has more of a "God only knows" side to it. It's also about perspective. Think about a hurricane. When you are aboard a ship amid a hurricane, all you feel is Chaos, even disaster. That's because you are too much inside it. If you happen to be in a weather satellite above the hurricane, then what you see from there is an orderly and majestic swirl moving along a certain path. Different viewpoints sometimes do give qualitatively different understandings.

What does this have to do with how we observe Earth Day in church?

For starters, let's take a quick look at the official stance of the UMC:

The Natural World

160 All creation is the Lord's, and we are responsible for the ways we use and abuse it. Water, air, soil, minerals, energy resources, plants, animal life, and space are to be valued and conserved because they are God's creation and not solely because they are useful to human beings. God has granted us stewardship of creation. We should meet these stewardship duties through acts of loving care and respect. Economic, political, social, and technological developments have increased our human numbers, and lengthened and enriched our lives. However, these developments have led to regional defoliation, dramatic extinction of species, massive human suffering, overpopulation, and misuse and overconsumption of natural and nonrenewable resources, particularly by industrialized societies.
This continued course of action jeopardizes the natural heritage that God has entrusted to all generations. Therefore, let us recognize the responsibility of the church and its members to place a high priority on changes in economic, political, social, and technological lifestyles to support a more ecologically equitable and sustainable world leading to a higher quality of life for all of God's creation.

This is a good general statement, and there's lots of specifics available to those interested. Other topics such as pesticide use, energy conservation, coal mining, recycling, and environmental justice are all covered in more detail. Check it out.

Last Year, the church council voted to join the California Interfaith Power and Light coalition, and asked our pastor to sign the covenant. Here it is:

California Interfaith Power & Light seeks to be faithful stewards of God’s Creation by responding to global warming through the promotion of energy conservation, energy efficiency, and renewable energy. This ministry intends to protect the earth’s ecosystems, safeguard public health, and ensure sufficient, sustainable energy for all.

Now, the pastor has signed it, but he can't do it all by himself. We all need to place our hands on the wheel of faith, and make it spin in the direction of Love.

Now, I'd like to ask for your imagination here. I had some grand plans for an example of how we can save some energy, but one thing led to another, the butterfly flapped its wings, and it didn't happen. So, please, turn around and look at the exit sign above the doors in the center. Please imagine it's an LED exit sign, like those traffic lights that have popped up since the big energy crisis. OK, everyone in on this imaginary sign? Good.
This one sign will save up to $24 a year in energy bills. This is nice, of course, nice that money that could go towards apportionments or other ministries isn't just going away in our energy bills. But that's just money, that's not the what's really important. That sign, over the course of a year, will use from 100-300 less KwH, which directly translates to less carbon dioxide getting dumped into our atmosphere, which is directly the cause of global warming. This church has pledged itself to protecting God's creation, and that little sign will be helping. We're going to change all the signs here, about 30 of 'em, and when you see the new signs, I hope you'll remember why we really did it. I'm hopeful that over the course of the next year, we'll be replacing most of our light fixtures with low energy versions, which will save even more power.

But let's get back to the wings of a butterfly; I'd like to talk about melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. It killed my father about 8 1/2 years ago, so it's something I'm quite aware of. Here's a simplified explanation of how one can get melanoma. Cancer is essentially a cell whose DNA has mutated, and survives to reproduce wildly, taking over, and damaging the body's organs. What starts this off is a tiny packet of ultraviolet light, invisible, yet quite damaging. Now we are under a certain amount of UV light all the time, and our bodies have certain ways to fend off damage, or even repair it. But once in a while, here and there around the world, one of these packets gets through, and damages a single cell to the point where it becomes a viable cancer. It's hard to say why it happens. I of course have asked myself why did my father have to die this way. It's kind of like the lottery, but not the kind you want to win. Now there's a lot of ways to protect yourself from UV rays; sunscreen, hats, longsleeve shirts, etc., but Mother Nature, Mother Earth, Gaia, has something else, and it's called the ozone layer. It's like our big blanket of sunscreen, but we've been unravelling it for years.

Now, more of those little packets of UV light are getting through, and melanoma rates are higher.

Now the ozone layer isn't being destroyed by global warming, I don't want to spread any junk science here, but these are both large complex systems that are caused by a large number of small events, as well as big ones. I'm not saying that if you replace your light bulbs with flourescents that somebody's father won't get melanoma, but the whole point of all this talk about butterfly wings is that we're all connected to each other, in a million ways, and what we do to, in, and around God's creation makes a difference.

I don't know how much time we have left here on earth, it's my dream we can protect Creation, and keep it around.

You might call me a dreamer.

Without Love in the Dream, it'll never come true.

Sunday, October 05, 2003

Review: Amazing Rhythm Aces Live at Moe's Alley

AMAZING RHYTHM ACES 10.5.03

A great show in the ultimate laid-back setting, too bad there weren't more people there, but the energy was great anyway!

Moe's Alley in Santa Cruz was the place, an early Sunday evening show, just right for me, since I had a 90-minute drive back to the city ahead of me.

The story actually started a couple days before. I got a call from my sister Rickie, that the Aces were playing in Redwood City at the Fox. There was no way I could go, but I went to the site, and noticed they had just played the Sweetwater, and were headed for Santa Cruz the next two nights.  It was nice to see old friends again.  The bass player, Jeff Davis, has been playing a bass I made for him for some time.

Sunday, October 06, 2002

Render Unto Caesar

[note from the future: This is the text of the lay sharing I delivered 10-6-02, which ended up getting me in a lot of trouble. Since the trouble I got in has never been resolved, nor have I been apologized to, I guess the words are worth keeping around.]

They say in public speaking that you start off by telling people what you're about to say, in condensed form. So here are my building blocks for today's sharing:

  • Pearls Before Swine
  • Render Unto Caesar
  • Stairway to Heaven
  • What Would Jesus Do?
Some of you know that Schuyler and I have argued, no, "discussed" our differing views about what the Bible verses dealing with "Render Unto Caesar" means to us. We've tailed off on that as of late, realizing that the other guy "just doesn't get it," but next week the Lectionary stops on Matthew 22:15-22. Next week is communion here at the early service, when we typically don't have a lay speaker. Since I wouldn't get a chance to do this again for another 3 years, Schuyler kindly agreed to shift it to this week.

Now, I have a telescope, a pair of binoculars, an astronomy program on my Palm Pilot, and I like to watch Star Trek; but this doesn't make me an astronomer, it barely qualifies me as an amateur astronomer.

So...just because I enjoy talking about the meaning of life, God, eternity, and all that, that doesn't make me a theologian either. If you're looking for an official explanation, talk to a professional. But if you'd like to hear what I think about all this stuff, you're in the right place.

This summer, I shared my views with you about the validity of finding new meanings in words that may never have meant to be interpreted in such a fashion. Recently, I stumbled across Matthew 7:6, which just tends to encourage me further in my quest for novel interpretations:

Matthew 7: 6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Now, I'd like to see a show of hands. How many of you have pearls? How many of you raise pigs? Hmmm...not many. I think what we're faced with here is a genuine allegory, a parable, not advice for the Future Farmers of America. What this passage says to me is that one has to consider the context of any situation. This dovetails right into the reading for today. So, here it is, of course from the King James version:
Matthew 22
15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk.
16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.
17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.
20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?
21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.
Now, I believe I used the "render unto Caesar" phrase a couple of years ago at a finance meeting. Often at meetings like that, some people don't like to deal with money in a "business-like fashion." "This is a church after all, and we do things different here." Thus began my difference of opinion about these words.

What's so nice about the lay sharing here is that it gives one the opportunity to spend some time reflecting on the meaning of different Bible verses. I've done a little online research, sent some email to Steve Fazenbaker, who always had a problem with lay people telling us what a Bible passage meant, since we didn't have the proper training. Steve's take on this section was that there didn't seem to be a clear opinion about what it meant anyway, but that it certainly showed Jesus' cleverness in getting out of a trap. He also turned me on to the writings of Josephus, which apparently contain a lot of parallels to the Bible. I don't want to get too sidetracked here, but you might want to check it out sometime as background.

Jesus is in the middle of a dispute between a group of Jews who adhered to the Fourth Philosophy of Judas the Galilean, and the Herodians, Jews who supported being submissive to Rome, who were looking for a way to arrest him.

I don't want to get too academic here, and put you all to sleep, but I found some interesting background information about this reading.

"Locally minted copper coins omitted the emperor's portrait due to Jerusalem's sensitivities, but because only the imperial mint could legally produce silver and gold coins, Palestine had many foreign coins in circulation. The silver denarius of Tiberius, including a portrait of his head, minted especially at Lyon, circulated there in this period. The coin related directly to pagan Roman religion and the imperial cult in the East: one side bore Caesar's image and the words "Tiberius Caesar, son of the Divine Augustus," while the other side referred to the high priest of Roman religion. Like it or not, Jews had to use this coin; it was the one required for the poll tax in all provinces."

"Further, some suggest that Jesus was challenging the idea that his opponents needed to hold on to the coins at all; why not return them to Caesar? Jerusalemites preferred death to allowing Caesar's image to enter Jerusalem on standards, yet they carried it in on coins."

So, the story and context here has some quite literal details. But once again I ask you. Look at a coin in your pocket. Is it The silver denarius of Tiberius? Once again, for these words to have lasting value, they need to grow into our current reality.

What we find here is the core of the separation of church and state, coming directly from the mouth of Jesus. You have heard before that because the radical Jews at the time felt everything belonged to God anyway, that Jesus' statement would seem to be no more than talking whilst keeping your fingers crossed behind your back. That logic only cuts so deep anyway, since if everything belongs to God, you might as well give Caesar his due, since God owns everything anyway, you can't really take anything away from God.

But, like I said earlier, this is just the way I see things, I'm not qualified to actually have a valid point of view! But...I might as well tell you what I think while I'm here.

I realize that part of the problem with interpreting the Bible in new ways, is that we all long for that solid rock, and that if people keep "fooling around" with scripture, we lose that sense of certainty about our spiritual path. I think of this as the "Stairway to Heaven" syndrome. We're going to play "Stairway to Heaven" in a few minutes, and I feel it's not just some rich old lady that believes she can get to heaven by buying her way in. I think we all feel that way a bit. I'm not trying to say getting into heaven should be an impossible task; I believe that via God's Grace, and His Love for all of us, we've already got that pass to the big "after the show party in the sky." But I believe the journey for enlightenment here on Earth can be pretty difficult.

I'm not really sure what kind of Christian I am, sometimes the various denominations just seem like different brand names for the same thing. But I will tell you what I like about Jesus. He always seems to find a new way of looking at things. Over and over again, we see him turning the status quo upside down. In Matthew 22, we can see two different groups of Jews trying to get him to choose one side or the other, and it takes Jesus' insight to see that there is another way to look at things.

There is a recent Christian youth movement called "What Would Jesus Do?" I don't know too much about what they really stand for, perhaps someone is getting rich off of selling WWJD bracelets, or maybe the youth are being told by conservative Christian adults what Jesus would indeed do, but I find the basic premise quite intriguing. I think that if you believe Jesus was divine, it's completely logical that an infinite God would be able to see how words could be interpreted in two millennia, or many more millennia for that matter. I think the major challenge we have as Christians is indeed to try and figure out what Jesus would do. I would like to repeat a fragment of the Four Quartets by T. S. Eliot here that I'm sure I've shared before, but is now perhaps more than ever exactly what I mean to say:

There is, it seems to us,
At best, only a limited value
In the knowledge derived from experience.
The knowledge imposes a pattern, and falsifies,
For the pattern is new in every moment
And every moment is a new and shocking
Valuation of all we have been.
I guess what I'm saying is that I believe "What Jesus Would Do" would continue to surprise and shock us. What I believe he left for me in the phrases "neither cast ye your pearls before swine" and "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." is an admonition to keep my heart tuned to the frequency of God's Love, and an open mind.

Friday, June 02, 2000

Review: Peter Green, "End of the Game"

The Missing Link
Just as "Dragonfly" is the quintessential Danny Kirwan song (what I mean by that is once you hear Danny's work on "Dragonfly" you understand and hear all his other Fleetwood Mac work better), "End of the Game" is key to understanding Peter's touch. When I first heard this album (remember Albums?) when it came out, it just sounded like stoned noodling. Not there's anything wrong with that! ;-) But at some point, I finally "got it," and could connect the dots in his style. When I heard the bootleg version of "Green Manalishi" which features an eerie 6-string bass solo (legend has it) it clearly sounds like Green, not McVie, especially if you've absorbed EOTG. Fans of Jerry Garcia would also appreciate the parallel work of Green on improvisational "space" music.

Monday, June 21, 1999

Summer Solstice

The Earth tilts forward
As far as it can go.
Changing my relationship to the Sun,
Changing my moods,
Driving the seasons and the weather.

There are things and powers
Greater than I in this Creation,
On this 3rd stone from the Sun.
But isn't it a miracle
That life exists at all?
Not too hot
Not too cold
The air just right
(sometimes at least!)
The days just long enough
Life goes on in this creation.
Isn't it a miracle?